RussellinSacto Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Hey Guys, First and foremost, thank all of you for bringing me around to see the power of UnRaid. You guys are convincing me to give this a go. I need your help... How's this hardware design? $100 - Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811147118 $66 - Three Cages: http://www.sundialmicro.com/cooler_master_4in3_device-stb3t4e3gp_1975_1348.html $70 - Power Supply: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817182087 $50 - Motherboard w/ 6 SATA ports: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138105R $53 - Processor: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103211 $40 - RAM: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134583 $169 - unRaid Pro Twin Pack: http://lime-technology.com/?page_id=44 $390 - 3 1.5TB Hard Disks: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148337 Total: $938 Any place I can reliably TRIM? Overspend anywhere? Anything where a few extra bucks would really benefit me down the road? I'm trying to get a reliable system (with room for lots of additional drives) for $730! I need a Buffalo Tera Station Killer!!! See this thread for the long story that got me here: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=2902.0 Thanks for any ideas, Russell P.S. Anyone near Sacramento, CA want to build this thing for a little cash? Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Save some trees... drop back to an AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 Brisbane 2.1GHz Socket AM2 45W Dual-Core Processor Model ADH2350DDBOX and underclock/undervolt it (or at least use powernow-k8) You'll save 200 kWhrs a year in power with the 25Watts of power you save. Here's what I run: root@tower6:~# acpitool -e CPU type : AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual Core Processor BE-2400 Min/Max frequency : 1000/2300 MHz Current frequency : 1000 MHz Frequency governor : ondemand Freq. scaling driver : powernow-k8 Cache size : 512 KB Bogomips : 1996.18 Processor ID : 0 Bus mastering control : yes Power management : no Throttling control : no Limit interface : no Active C-state : C1 C-states (incl. C0) : 2 Thermal zone 1 : ok, 18 C If you want to "match" the TS, you only need 1 cage for now. You don't need 2GB of RAM... it won't help you. Again, to "match" the TS, this system does not even need an unRAID license (2 data drives, 1 parity).... saves $169. So that saves you $240 if you are just "matching" the TS. Buy the license and extra cages when you need them... not before. Quote Link to comment
brainbone Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Since you're buying a separate power supply, there's no need to purchase a case with a power supply. any of these two would work just fine. 1) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119152 ($50) 2) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811147104 ($65) #2, The rosewill case (looks like the one you chose, but with no PS), seems to constrict air flow to the drive bays. With case #1, you could conceivably delay purchase of the three 4-drive cages until you purchase more than 3 drives. The rosewill case would let you go up to 6 drives before needing to change drive cages. (save $66 here) Not sure if you really need a dual core CPU. Something as simple as a sempron ($30, 45w) will do fine. Quote Link to comment
lionelhutz Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Save $72 on the case and one rack. That Coolermaster case (item #1 brainbone posted) is a good case and is the one I'm using. It comes with a single 4into3 rack similar to the ones you posted which lets you install 4 drives as is and save buying one of those drive adapters. So, $50 case and $22 adapter = $72 Save $20 and get a single core processor. You could likely save $10 to $20 on 1gig of ram or a little cheaper ram. Anyways, that saves you about $100 and still gets you 6 drive capability. Don't forget, you have a motherboard with 6 SATA and you're buying a case to hold 12 drives. Either drop a drive cage or buy a $100 PCIe card to 4 SATA and/or a $20 PCIe card to 2 SATA to get up to either 8 or 12 drives. I don't have the link offhand but can find it for you if you want. Peter Quote Link to comment
ilovejedd Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 How about this: $50 - Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119152 $44 - Two Cages: http://www.sundialmicro.com/cooler_master_4in3_device-stb3t4e3gp_1975_1348.html (delay until needed) $100 - Power Supply: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139005 $110 - Motherboard w/ 6 SATA ports: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182162 (official unRAID board) $40 - Processor: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116039 $53 - RAM: http://shop.kingston.com/partsinfo.asp?ktcpartno=KVR1066D3N7K2/2G $169 - unRaid Pro Twin Pack: http://lime-technology.com/?page_id=44 $390 - 3 1.5TB Hard Disks: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148337 Total: $956 Not much higher than your original build, but it's got a well-built power supply and the new official unRAID board. For future expansion, add a couple of Adaptec 1430SA PCI-e SATA controller cards (same used by limetech). You can occasionally find the 1.5TB drives for around $100~110 after coupon or cashback. That's a pretty significant source of savings if you're buying a whole bunch of them. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 The rosewill case (looks like the one you chose, but with no PS), seems to constrict air flow to the drive bays. That's a GOOD thing. unRAID will never tax/overheat a CPU -- but drive cages that pack drives in densely make drive overheating a more likely issue. You should block every air-intake other than the drive bays ion unRAID (which is the opposite of the way you would set up an overclocked gaming rig). Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Intel CPUs have better horsepower and a lot of overclock headroom. AMD CPUs are the better choice for an "always-on" box that is not CPU intensice work as they have better support for dynamic underclocking/undervolting. You can even run them on passive cooling. Quote Link to comment
ilovejedd Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Intel CPUs have better horsepower and a lot of overclock headroom. AMD CPUs are the better choice for an "always-on" box that is not CPU intensice work as they have better support for dynamic underclocking/undervolting. You can even run them on passive cooling. True. Unfortunately, the official board uses Intel CPUs. Quote Link to comment
lionelhutz Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 I forgot to comment but that Rosewill supply with dual 12V rails isn't the best. Better to find a supply with a high capability single 12V rail. Peter Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 True. Unfortunately, the official board uses Intel CPUs. Use a different board. This thread is schizophrenic. Is this supposed to be a TS "EQUAVELENT" box (4GB/3GB, slow as Xmas, no expandability) or something that can be expanded to a full 16-drive unRAID system? Those are two very different things. If you want to compare costs apples to apples, you have to do the former. If you are doing hte latter, you are getting a lot that the former does not have, so you can't compare the price the same way. Quote Link to comment
ilovejedd Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Any place I can reliably TRIM? Overspend anywhere? Anything where a few extra bucks would really benefit me down the road? I'm trying to get a reliable system (with room for lots of additional drives) for $730! I need a Buffalo Tera Station Killer!!! This thread is schizophrenic. Is this supposed to be a TS "EQUAVELENT" box (4GB/3GB, slow as Xmas, no expandability) or something that can be expanded to a full 16-drive unRAID system? Those are two very different things. If you want to compare costs apples to apples, you have to do the former. If you are doing hte latter, you are getting a lot that the former does not have, so you can't compare the price the same way. I kinda think it might be the latter, hence the willingness to spend more than what a Buffalo Tera Station would have cost. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Here's a nice project: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=829718 Take the same case design, but use unRAID and ditch the RAID controller. Sell it with 3 drives.... user can add 2 more. Quote Link to comment
lionelhutz Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 This thread is schizophrenic. Is this supposed to be a TS "EQUAVELENT" box (4GB/3GB, slow as Xmas, no expandability) or something that can be expanded to a full 16-drive unRAID system? Those are two very different things. If you want to compare costs apples to apples, you have to do the former. If you are doing hte latter, you are getting a lot that the former does not have, so you can't compare the price the same way. Yes, there seems to be confusion as to what the OP wants. That is why I listed my "barebones" 6 drive build in the other thread. Just to show that you can build a 4T Unraid server for less than that TS. I think it would have been < $550 in parts (or $600 with a better power supply) using 1.5T drives and still have room for 3 more drives to expand to 7.5T of data total. On another note, the parts posted by ilovejedd are solid. Peter Quote Link to comment
brainbone Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 The rosewill case (looks like the one you chose, but with no PS), seems to constrict air flow to the drive bays. That's a GOOD thing. Guess I wasn't clear. The Rosewill case appears to reduce the amount of airflow to the drives due to the drive cage door. Less airflow to the drives, in my opinion, is a bad thing. Not sure if the obstruction of the door is enough to worry about, but... Is this supposed to be a TS "EQUAVELENT" box (4GB/3GB, slow as Xmas, no expandability) or something that can be expanded to a full 16-drive unRAID system? Looking at the spec. of the system in the OP, and knowing the context of RussellinSacto's wants from other threads, I'd say this is for a system that can be expended to at least 12 drives, but that will start with 3TB (3 drives). Quote Link to comment
RussellinSacto Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 Hi Guys, Sorry for the confusion... I need an unRaid solution that: 1. Is Reliable (fans, power supply, decent motherboard, airflow case, etc.) 2. Is Easy to build (I consider myself an Appliance Buyer - I don't want to spend more than a couple hours putting this thing together - I don't want to CUT a case to cram crap in). 3. Is Expandable to a full set of 15+ drives. 4. Includes 3TB of redundant storage (the same as a 4TB, Buffalo Station) (obviously, this will be 3x 1.5 TB SATA drives) 5. Includes a pair of Pro Licenses and Hard Drive Cages and everything that would allow me to cram up to 15+ drives into in a month if that's what I need to do. (I don't want to buy anything new for this machine but drives and SATA controllers as I move forward). 6. Is priced within a couple hundred dollars of the Buffalo Tera Station offering - $729. Thank you, again, gentlemen (you know if you don't apply ), for the suggestions. Russell Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 The Rosewill case appears to reduce the amount of airflow to the drives due to the drive cage door. Yes, upi are correct -- *that* would indeed be a bad thing. I tend to remove doors and the like for that reason. Looking at the spec. of the system in the OP, and knowing the context of RussellinSacto's wants from other threads, I'd say this is for a system that can be expended to at least 12 drives, but that will start with 3TB (3 drives). My feeling is that starting with 3 and expanding to a full 16 is a rare occurrence. IMX, most people who adequately size their initial server size, when their space needs double in a couple of years, the size of drives has doubled, so rarely will a user do much more than double their initial number of drives, if they stay on a 3 to 5 year rotation of replacing the oldest (smallest) drives with larger ones. That way you can also stay in drive warranty. A 3TB server, with 3 drives, can expand to 5 drives and 6TB over 3 years. By then, we'll have 3TB drives for $100. Start replacing 1.5TB drives with 3TB drives, and you get to 12TB total, with only 5 drives over the next couple of years. Quote Link to comment
RussellinSacto Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 Hmmm.... Bubba, that's a good point... I guess I just don't know what my needs will be... What I don't want to do is buy a setup: Case, Power Supply, etc... only to have to buy a new Case, Power Supply, etc. if I do need to expand. I'd rather buy once and maybe not use all the capacity... than buy too little and have to rebuild the whole darned thing in a few months. Thanks for your continuing feedback, Russell Quote Link to comment
RussellinSacto Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 In reality, I'm probably looking at a 8-10 drive system or so... It just didn't seem like I'd save more than a $50-75 by having a 10 drive case and 10 drive power supply than I would by having a 15 drive case and power supply right off the bat? Russell Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 You need to give some more specs: What is your spec on sound level from the fans... as that can make a big difference in price. Do you want low power usage, since this is an always-on box? Do you want to add applicaitons to it (i.e. torrent or NZB downloading, a web server, media portal etc). Your specs require expandability to 16 drives... that means either: 1) a case with 16 bays 2) a case with 12 bays and three 4-in-3 cages 3) a case with 9 bays and three 5-in-3 cages None of these are cheap. The 12-bay CM-Stacker with the inexpensive 4-in-3 cages is probably the cheapest. A rack-mount RAID case with the necessary trays would be second, around $300. Option 3 would be the most expensive, as the three 5-in-3 cages will cost you $300 off the bat. Consider something like this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811219021 This is why what you are asking for borders on unrealistic... starting off small, with a low price-point, but wanting the maximum (16 drive) expandability... all in the same package. You are increasing your initial drive count by a factor of 5! That is a HELL of a lot of flexibility you want, and that costs money. I suggest that you decide how many drives you ultimately will need.... taking into account that drive sizes double every 2 to 3 years, and planning to rotate out drives on a 3 to 5 year schedule to stay in warranty. A max of 8 to 10 drives would be a good sweet spot in terms of a case and cages. Quote Link to comment
brainbone Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 I guess the question is, do you think you'll need more than 7.5TB in 2 years? If not, allowing expansion to 6 drives should be adequate. The Rosewill case will get you this, without any additional drive cages. This allows you to start with 3TB, and add an additional 4.5 TB in the very near future. You can then start retiring the older drives and replacing them with drives larger than 1.5TB when they are available at a good price. If so, and you don't think you'll go past 16.5TB in 2 years, go for a 12 drive system like your original post. If you need 15+ drives (more than 16.5TB in 2 years), you'll need to look at 12 5.25 bay cases to use 4 4in3 drive cages (~$150+) or 5in3 hotswap bays in a 9 5.25 case. At this point, setting up a second server may be a better option. Quote Link to comment
RussellinSacto Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 Thank you for your patience... From those criteria... I think I'm a 12 driver in the near future (next 6-12 mos). I was totally unaware of where the appropriate price barriers hit. I need an unRaid solution that: 1. Is Reliable (fans, power supply, decent motherboard, airflow case, etc.) 2. Is Easy to build (I consider myself an Appliance Buyer - I don't want to spend more than a couple hours putting this thing together - I don't want to CUT a case to cram crap in). 3. Is Expandable to a full set of 15+ drives. 4. Includes 3TB of redundant storage (the same as a 4TB, Buffalo Station) (obviously, this will be 3x 1.5 TB SATA drives) 5. Includes a pair of Pro Licenses and Hard Drive Cages and everything that would allow me to cram up to 15+ drives into in a month if that's what I need to do. (I don't want to buy anything new for this machine but drives and SATA controllers as I move forward). 6. Is priced within a couple hundred dollars of the Buffalo Tera Station offering - $729. My original post gave a solution I'd come up with (not intelligently, I admit) for about $950 that I thought met my criteria (quoted above)... More than anything, I guess I just wanted suggestions to make that a reliably good system. Sorry for being so difficult... Once I have a parts list, I'm ready to do this. Russell Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Here's what I suggest. Get the Lian Li case with 9 fullsized drive bays ... it comes with one 3-in-2 cage that houses the power/reset switches. Then get 2 of the 4-in-3 CM cages for $$22 each. That gives you the least expensive cages, good shock mounting, and the BEST and QUIETEST cooling.... 11 drives total and one spare 5.25 bay left for a CD, or multi-IO panel... or 12th drive. That saves you $150 over a full 16-drive capable system. Max of 12 drives will let you stay with a 500Watt PSU. Before specing a mobo, answer these 2: - Do you want low power usage, since this is an always-on box? (if so, a 45Watt single-core Sempron is called for) - Do you want to add applications to it (i.e. torrent or NZB downloading, a web server, media portal etc, VM). (if so, you need more CPU for RAR processing or transcoding especially) Quote Link to comment
RussellinSacto Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 Bubba, I appreciate you walking me through the options... I've been out of hardware so long that I'm damn near illiterate. 1. Sure, since it's always on, lower power draw is a positive... What's the negative of that option? Initial cost? I presume there is some tradeoff? 2. No applications at all... Simply storing gigantic (15GB) Photoshop files mostly... and RAW/JPG images from my cameras. Thanks, Russell Quote Link to comment
ilovejedd Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 1. Sure, since it's always on, lower power draw is a positive... What's the negative of that option? Initial cost? I presume there is some tradeoff? Performance. Not really noticeable if you only need it for massive storage and don't need/want to run additional applications. Going with a low-power single-core is actually cheaper and unRAID itself doesn't really require the additional horsepower. I highly suggest you consider the earlier build I posted. If you only need 12 drives, maybe just swap the PSU for a 500W one. True, Intel won't win against AMD on the low-end, low-cost, low-power solution, but there are benefits to using the same board that Tom's testing unRAID on. At the very least, you know that the board works with unRAID. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Low power is cheaper... single core 45Watt Sempron or Athlon 64 with a low-power NB chipset like the 690G will save you money both in power and initial cost. I am running unRAID on a Biostar TA690G AM2 but it is not available any more..... anything with the 690G chipset gives good low-power consumption, but I'n not sure about later versions like the 790. If I had to buy a replacement today, I'd look at this: ($70) BIOSTAR TFORCE TA780G M2+ AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G Micro ATX AMD http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138105 ($35) AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 Orleans 2.6GHz Socket AM2 45W Single-Core Processor Model ADH1640DHBOX http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103239 A less expensive alternative to the Lian Li is http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119152 Same 9-bay design, but $50 less... and I like that the weight of the PSU is at the bottom. But you'll need a 3rd cage... so you actually only save $30. Turns out, it comes with a 4-in-3 cage too... so you do save $50. And you'll want to cover up the side and top vents unless you use them for exhaust. I'd also spend a few bucks for a fan-speed controller and some Y-adapters for fan connectors. Hook all three of the cage fans together on the controller, and dial them back for sound. use the auto-speed CPU fan function in the BIOS for the mobo. Put a Zalman fanmate sensor or a fan controller on the 120MM exhaust fan in the back of the case. And regardless of what anyone says ... you can run unRAID just fine with a single 512M stick of RAM (see below) .... I currently am doing it on my server, even with a VirtualBox VM running WinXP hosted on it .... particularly when you said that you are not greatly concerned about moderate write speeds, since you are using it mostly for archival-type storage. I'm sure you have a spare 200G crap drive lying around to use for a cache drive. CPU[|| 1.9%] Tasks: 73 total, 2 running Mem:470M used:321M buffers:36M cache:106M Load average: 0.02 0.03 0.00 Swp[| 32/3773MB] Uptime: 17 days, 18:37:41 Time: [||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||01:46:33] PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command 1 root 20 0 776 144 112 S 0.0 0.0 0:08.38 init [3] 9718 root 20 0 2624 688 352 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.06 `- hddtemp -d /dev/hda 8443 root 20 0 2388 912 792 S 0.0 0.2 0:04.34 `- awk -W re-interval -f /boot/femur/listen.awk 7775 root 20 0 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.03 `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7783 root 20 0 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.17 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7782 root 20 0 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7781 root 20 0 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:35.79 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7780 root 23 3 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7779 root 16 -4 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:21.35 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7778 root 16 -4 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7777 root 20 0 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.17 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7776 root 20 0 37920 6144 3200 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.01 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4//VBoxSVC --automate 7751 root 20 0 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:00.09 `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7796 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:01.11 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7795 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:05.15 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7794 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:06.12 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7793 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 26:16.43 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7792 root 16 -4 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 11:22.39 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7791 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:07.46 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7790 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7789 root 21 1 272M 216M 4544 R 1.0 46.1 44h50:29 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7788 root 19 -1 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:04.94 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7787 root 19 -1 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 2:35.11 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7786 root 19 -1 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:17.95 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7784 root 17 -3 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7770 root 20 0 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7769 root 20 0 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:00.01 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 7766 root 20 0 4888 2000 1420 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.09 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxXPCOMIPCD 7765 root 20 0 272M 216M 4544 S 0.0 46.1 0:00.00 | `- /opt/VirtualBox-2.0.4/VBoxHeadless --startvm WinXP 1670 root 20 0 6096 948 752 S 0.0 0.2 0:15.22 `- /usr/sbin/nmbd -D 1667 root 20 0 9600 2104 1700 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.07 `- /usr/sbin/smbd -D 1669 root 20 0 9600 576 280 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 | `- /usr/sbin/smbd -D 1561 root 20 0 1708 476 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /sbin/agetty 38400 tty6 linux 1560 root 20 0 1708 464 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /sbin/agetty 38400 tty5 linux 1559 root 20 0 1708 464 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /sbin/agetty 38400 tty4 linux 1558 root 20 0 1708 468 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /sbin/agetty 38400 tty3 linux 1557 root 20 0 1708 464 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /sbin/agetty 38400 tty2 linux 1556 root 20 0 1708 476 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /sbin/agetty 38400 tty1 linux 1531 root 20 0 18296 720 584 S 0.0 0.1 0:23.51 `- apcupsd 1573 root 20 0 18296 720 584 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.03 | `- apcupsd 1436 root 20 0 74016 3844 1936 S 0.0 0.8 1:12.94 `- /usr/local/bin/nzbget -D 1440 root 20 0 74016 3844 1936 S 0.0 0.8 1:55.50 | `- /usr/local/bin/nzbget -D 1439 root 20 0 74016 3844 1936 S 0.0 0.8 2:52.51 | `- /usr/local/bin/nzbget -D 1438 root 20 0 74016 3844 1936 S 0.0 0.8 0:00.14 | `- /usr/local/bin/nzbget -D 1400 root 20 0 44672 1348 1100 S 0.0 0.3 0:45.80 `- /usr/local/sbin/emhttp -p 88 1380 root 20 0 1924 400 376 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /usr/sbin/gpm -m /dev/mouse -t imps2 1372 root 20 0 59936 5464 4160 S 0.0 1.1 0:22.02 `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 21343 apache 20 0 60972 8712 5092 S 0.0 1.8 0:56.06 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 16739 apache 20 0 61748 9184 4908 S 0.0 1.9 0:10.79 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 16738 apache 20 0 61732 9120 4892 S 0.0 1.9 0:32.86 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 16737 apache 20 0 61372 8556 4980 S 0.0 1.8 0:33.46 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 9700 apache 20 0 60700 8216 4928 S 0.0 1.7 0:26.43 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 9662 apache 20 0 60688 8208 4936 S 0.0 1.7 0:26.76 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 9019 apache 20 0 60952 8388 4848 S 0.0 1.7 0:29.76 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 1582 apache 20 0 60792 8052 4836 S 0.0 1.7 0:57.38 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 1460 apache 20 0 61856 9140 4900 S 0.0 1.9 0:28.93 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 1458 apache 20 0 60716 8092 4848 S 0.0 1.7 0:35.71 | `- /usr/sbin/httpd -k start 1360 daemon 20 0 1916 392 304 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /usr/sbin/atd -b 15 -l 1 1358 root 20 0 1916 616 536 S 0.0 0.1 0:13.50 `- /usr/sbin/crond -l10 1317 haldaemo 20 0 5516 3168 2464 S 0.0 0.7 0:40.20 `- /usr/sbin/hald --daemon=yes 1318 root 20 0 3100 980 848 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.01 | `- hald-runner 1341 root 20 0 3188 932 828 S 0.0 0.2 0:54.06 | `- hald-addon-storage: polling /dev/sda (every 2 sec) 1327 haldaemo 20 0 2216 872 788 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 | `- hald-addon-acpi: listening on acpid socket /var/run/acpid 1311 messageb 20 0 2332 688 560 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system 1300 root 20 0 1700 516 464 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 `- /usr/sbin/acpid 1293 root 20 0 3936 884 712 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.01 `- /usr/sbin/sshd F1Help F2Setup F3SearchF4InvertF5Tree F6SortByF7Nice -F8Nice +F9Kill F10Quit Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.