limetech Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Download The Release Notes are now located on the unRAID wiki. Quote Link to comment
papnikol Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 very nice! i think i will be moving soon to v.5. Just one question: do you have any idea as to when there will be a non-beta/final version 5 available? Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Downloading as I type this. Looking forward to giving it a solid workout. Quote Link to comment
GK20 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 upgrade from 5.0-beta2. as following screen captures shown unraid can not detect IDE disks, no issue at 5.0-beta2. Device list from webGui shown no IDE disks however list from unmenu shown all disks. MB : MSI P43 Neo3-F Syslog shown system had successfully detcted both IDE disks, so looks like a presentation issue in webgui? Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: scsi6 : usb-storage 1-6:1.0 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: hda: WDC WD5000AAJB-00UHA0, ATA DISK drive Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: usb 4-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5.00: ATA-8: ST3750330AS, SD35, max UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5.00: 1465149168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6.00: ATA-8: WDC WD5000AAKS-00YGA0, 12.01C02, max UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: hdb: MAXTOR STM3500630A, ATA DISK drive Quote Link to comment
GK20 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 CPU temperature reading is missing from "CPU info" at unmenu at 5.0-beta3, no problem at 5.0-beta2. Syslog shown following messages, looks like sensor driver has been removed at 5.0beta3? Feb 1 00:09:55 TestTower unmenu[1187]: Try sensors-detect to find out which these are. Feb 1 00:10:02 TestTower unmenu[1187]: No sensors found! Feb 1 00:10:02 TestTower unmenu[1187]: Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need. Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 The advanced power management related features have been made modular. Could you try logging in to a linux command prompt to issue a "sensors-detect", run through the prompts, then issuing "sensors" to see what your output is? Then if it tells you to modprobe any drivers, such as f71882fg, lm75, to give it go, then reissue a "sensors" command? If you get any sort of reading out of that, then try reloading the webpage to see if you get any info from that as well. Quote Link to comment
Benni-chan Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 mounting a hfs filesystem doesn't work anymore. it was no problem in 4.6, 4.7 and 5.0beta2. mount -t hfs /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD15EARS-00_WD-WMAVU3106264-part2 /mnt/disk/Serien_I-part2 mount: unknown filesystem type 'hfs' Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 mounting a hfs filesystem doesn't work anymore. it was no problem in 4.6, 4.7 and 5.0beta2. mount -t hfs /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD15EARS-00_WD-WMAVU3106264-part2 /mnt/disk/Serien_I-part2 mount: unknown filesystem type 'hfs' Try using HFSPLUS instead of HFS for the filesystem type. mount -t hfsplus /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD15EARS-00_WD-WMAVU3106264-part2 /mnt/disk/Serien_I-part2 To see the list of supported filesystems look at /proc/filesystems. cat /proc/filesystems Quote Link to comment
Benni-chan Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 ok, my bad. of course it has to be hfsplus indeed i have an other problem. i use snap to mount these extra drives and snap uses the "vol_id" command to get the filesystem for each drive. this command is no longer supported, it seems. Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 ok, my bad. of course it has to be hfsplus indeed i have an other problem. i use snap to mount these extra drives and snap uses the "vol_id" command to get the filesystem for each drive. this command is no longer supported, it seems. Correct. The vol_id program was removed and replaced with other means when the udev subsystem was upgraded. It is no longer supported on current udev subsystems. The replacement for 'vol_id' is 'blkid' and "vol_id --export" becomes "blkid -o udev". The user community addon SNAP will need to be updated if it wants to support the final 5.0 series. Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 ok, my bad. of course it has to be hfsplus indeed i have an other problem. i use snap to mount these extra drives and snap uses the "vol_id" command to get the filesystem for each drive. this command is no longer supported, it seems. Correct. The vol_id program was removed and replaced with other means when the udev subsystem was upgraded. It is no longer supported on current udev subsystems. The replacement for 'vol_id' is 'blkid' and "vol_id --export" becomes "blkid -o udev". The user community addon SNAP will need to be updated if it wants to support the final 5.0 series. And unMENU's disk management page will also need to be updated before it will show the file system type (and, as a result, will not show the "mount" button until it has been modified. I guess I need to download and install the 5.0-beta3 release to my second server. ). Quote Link to comment
cj0r Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Hey BRiT, moment of truth for the LSI1068E based cards (IBM BR10i for instance)!!! I'm on the verge of pulling the trigger on my new hardware since Intel is recalling the 1155 gear (I'm back on the 1156 bus!). Quote Link to comment
SSD Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 very nice! i think i will be moving soon to v.5. Just one question: do you have any idea as to when there will be a non-beta/final version 5 available? The time it takes for a beta to become a release varies. According to the roadmap, there is one more scheduled beta (5.0b4) before the the offiical 5.0 release. 5.0b4 will include support for >2T drives. There has been no official word from Tom about the timeline for this beta nor the release, but would not expect to see a 5.0 final before March - and that could be optimistic. Might want to hold off this type of question until the beta matures. After spending many many days and weeks getting this ready for beta release, and releasing a long anticipated beta with significant new functionality, getting questions the official release date before anyone has even installed the beta would be annoying. Quote Link to comment
Chris Pollard Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Working AFP also makes me interested in moving to v5. Having a root around the forums leads me to believe I need to remove the HPA created by my old GB motherboard, then upgrade to 4.7, then upgrade to v5b3. Screwing around with this HPA thing makes me nervous, pretty sure it'll make people less techy than me even more nervous. Quote Link to comment
solrac3 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 upgrade from 5.0-beta2. as following screen captures shown unraid can not detect IDE disks, no issue at 5.0-beta2. Device list from webGui shown no IDE disks however list from unmenu shown all disks. MB : MSI P43 Neo3-F Syslog shown system had successfully detcted both IDE disks, so looks like a presentation issue in webgui? Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: scsi6 : usb-storage 1-6:1.0 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: hda: WDC WD5000AAJB-00UHA0, ATA DISK drive Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: usb 4-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5.00: ATA-8: ST3750330AS, SD35, max UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5.00: 1465149168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6.00: ATA-8: WDC WD5000AAKS-00YGA0, 12.01C02, max UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: ata6.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 31 23:53:37 TestTower kernel: hdb: MAXTOR STM3500630A, ATA DISK drive I second this motion... My Test Server with UnRaid 5.0_beta2 works great. I upgraded it to 5.0_beta3 and no longer does it show the IDE drives. All SATA are there but no IDE. Downgraded to 5.0_beta2 and all is perfect again. Good thing is only a test server... Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted February 1, 2011 Author Share Posted February 1, 2011 You guys with undetected IDE drives: please exeucte this command from telnet session & post output: ls /dev/disk/by-path Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 I will try to get 5.0b3 installed on my test server tonight and run the above command. The test server has 2 IDE and 1 SATA drive in it. Quote Link to comment
kingpin Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 i installed 5.0 beta 3 and had to reassign all the drives. it says that two are missing (out of 22). i assigned all that were available and then rebooted the system. upon reboot 7 of the drives i just assigned were assigned in different locations and 3 were missing. any ideas? Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted February 1, 2011 Author Share Posted February 1, 2011 i installed 5.0 beta 3 and had to reassign all the drives. it says that two are missing (out of 22). i assigned all that were available and then rebooted the system. upon reboot 7 of the drives i just assigned were assigned in different locations and 3 were missing. any ideas? Are the missing drives IDE? Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted February 1, 2011 Author Share Posted February 1, 2011 i installed 5.0 beta 3 and had to reassign all the drives. it says that two are missing (out of 22). i assigned all that were available and then rebooted the system. upon reboot 7 of the drives i just assigned were assigned in different locations and 3 were missing. any ideas? Also, if you could post following it would be very helpful: a) First assign all the drives, then type: ls /dev/disk/by-path b) Now reboot, and if drives have assigned in different locations, again type: ls /dev/disk/by-path Post results of both. Quote Link to comment
peter_sm Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 did a test with beta 3, I followed the instruction, after booting all my disk is missing and I have a blank web page? :'( Back to 4.7 Attached is my syslog //Peter syslog-2011-02-01.zip Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted February 1, 2011 Author Share Posted February 1, 2011 did a test with beta 3, I followed the instruction, after booting all my disk is missing and I have a blank web page? :'( Back to 4.7 Attached is my syslog //Peter Did you read the part in the Release Notes where it says: "If any of your hard drives appear missing or wrong, you can either go to Settings/Disk Devices and re-assign all your hard drives, or you can go to Utils/New Slots and execute that utility to change the device assignments for you. Depending on your hardware configuration this step may not be necessary." Quote Link to comment
peter_sm Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 My webpage is empty , so I cant do anything Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted February 1, 2011 Author Share Posted February 1, 2011 My webpage is empty What browser? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.