bubbaQ Posted January 11, 2009 Author Share Posted January 11, 2009 No speed-stepping, perhaps.... but it will have throttling. That's why you have to use p4_clockmod instead of speedstep - it doesn't have multiple C-states. Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 No speed-stepping, perhaps.... but it will have throttling. That's why you have to use p4_clockmod instead of speedstep - it doesn't have multiple C-states. Well great! I was hoping that may be the case. I couldn't do anything in windows to throttle it. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 11, 2009 Author Share Posted January 11, 2009 Try RMClock: http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/rmclock.shtml Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Try RMClock: http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/rmclock.shtml Tried it. Did nothing. Doesn't matter now anyhow as that is the cpu I am using for my unRAID system. I'm patiently waiting for bubbaRAID .9 for a new install to release. Then I'll experiment with the settings you mentioned and S3. I may go back to unRAID 4.3.3 and install bubbaRAID .7 and go thru the upgrade process. Quote Link to comment
NLS Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 my CPU is a P4 640 (this is enough to ID it) Quote Link to comment
TXFI Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 bubbaQ, you're still compiling Tom's unRAID SW into bubbaRAID, right? It's not like you can claim any ownership of his work or the rest of the open source you are packaging so why not use unRAId to make it clear to people that your baseline IS unRAID? Without Tom's work bubbaRAID would be just a slim Slackware distro that does nothing special... If asked, Tom might even agree to the naming convention, as long as his IPR is protected in terms of unRAID. Again, I'm not here to start a flame war, just saying that "bubbaRAID" could be misleading some newbies to think it's something better than from where Tom gets his bread and butter. I'm also very well aware of your outstanding contributions towards the unRAID community so far and thus will leave it to your best discretion what to do about this topic, if anything. Thank you! Quote Link to comment
NLS Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 make it BubbunRAID or BubbanRAID (sounds the same) Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 11, 2009 Author Share Posted January 11, 2009 Wow... you guys have no concept of trademark law and the Lanham Act! BubbaRaid is not a stand-alone package... it has to be installed on top of a regular unRAID installation. So someone has to get and install unRAID first. No way to confuse it as an "alternative" to unRAID. BubbaRaid has only GPL software, and does not contain Tom's proprietary parts (i.e. emhttp).... that's why it only works if installed on the same stick as a regular unRAID install. Quote Link to comment
NLS Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 nope, it was clear to me already - I hope you don't refer to me Quote Link to comment
aitf311 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 I just wanted to say thank you for making such a great package. It's really changed the way I use my server and I hope you know your efforts are very much appreciated! Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 OK. A new beta version of BubbaRaid for unRAID 4.4.2 is available to download and test. Link is in the OP. This is a FULL install package. If you already have BubbaRaid installed, this will OVERWRITE any changes to the BubbaRaid configuration files you may have made. Hopefully, the next version will preserve existing BubbaRaid config files. If you are already running BubbaRaid and have made a number of custom edits to the config files, you may want to wait for the next version of BubbaRaid. Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Woot! And I thought play time for the weekend was over.... Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 I got BubbaRAID installed. I did "acpitool -c" and got similar results as NLS. Then I did "modprobe p4_clockmod" and now my results look like this: CPU type : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz Min/Max frequency : 300/2400 MHz Current frequency : 300 MHz Frequency governor : ondemand Freq. scaling driver : p4-clockmod Cache size : 512 KB Bogomips : 4810.89 Bogomips : 4811.09 # of CPU's found : 2 Processor ID : 0 Bus mastering control : no Power management : no Throttling control : no Limit interface : no Active C-state : C0 C-states (incl. C0) : 1 Processor ID : 1 Bus mastering control : no Power management : no Throttling control : no Limit interface : no Active C-state : C0 C-states (incl. C0) : 1 It looks like it's actually running at 300mhz now, is that correct? Does this mean the modprobe worked? Will it stay after rebooting? My fans are still running at full speed. In the BIOS it is set to speed up and slow down based on CPU temp, does this setting not get used in linux? Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 Yup.. it is running in low speed now.. give it a couple of minutes and you should see the CPU cool down a few degrees. It should be using "ondemand" governor and then speed up if the CPU needs it. Try the commands "acpitool -t" and "sensors" to see if you get CPU temps. Or run "sensors-detect" to find out what sensors you have. Then modprobe the appropriate ones and you should gets lots of hardware info when you run "sensors" This command will tell you what speed-governors are available to you: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors BTW, AMD processors are MUCH better at using lower power and running cooler in a low-power state, than similar Intel processors. Anyone that want's to minimize power consumption whould lean heavily in favor of AMD CPUs. Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Great. Thanks for the info. I'll try those things, as of right now I don't see my CPU temp anywhere. So I typed "sensors-detect" then ran thru all the scanning just saying yes to all and ended up with: Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done. Just press ENTER to continue: Driver `it87' (should be inserted): Detects correctly: * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0500' Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x2d Chip `ITE IT8712F' (confidence: * ISA bus, address 0x290 Chip `ITE IT8712F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (yes/NO): yes Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors for initialization at boot time. You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required kernel modules. Then I typed "service lm_sensors start", but got a command not found error. Do I have to restart to get the lm_sensor going? When I "cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors", the reponse I got was: ondemand performance Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 Look at the contents of /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors and /etc/init.d/lm_sensors Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 I rebooted and the modprobe had to be done again. Once I did that and redid the sensor scan I looked for the files/directories you listed. /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors and /etc/init.d/lm_sensorsI have /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors , but I do not have a /etc/init.d/ directory. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 Yes, when you reboot, anything that you added via modprobe has to be added again. Put the modprobes in your go script. At the end of sensors-detect, it should tell you what needs to be added with modprobe something like this: Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (yes/NO): To load everything that is needed, add this to one of the system initialization scripts (e.g. /etc/rc.d/rc.local): #----cut here---- # Chip drivers modprobe it87 modprobe k8temp /usr/bin/sensors -s #----cut here---- But then again, I have no experience with your Intel mobo and can't say exactly what modules it needs. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 New BubbaRaid - version 0.0.11 - now includes unraid_notify script and configuration screen for editing config file, starting, stopping, and sending test e-mail. - new wizard for configuring unraid_notify script (will be expanded to other applications) - now installing a new version of BubbaRaid does NOT overwrite your old BubbaRaid config files. I'm also close on having the online-upgrade working for BubbaRaid, so we can do away with this download/unzip-to-flash stuff. Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 New BubbaRaid - version 0.0.11 - now includes unraid_notify script and configuration screen for editing config file, starting, stopping, and sending test e-mail. - new wizard for configuring unraid_notify script (will be expanded to other applications) - now installing a new version of BubbaRaid does NOT overwrite your old BubbaRaid config files. I'm also close on having the online-upgrade working for BubbaRaid, so we can do away with this download/unzip-to-flash stuff. Very cool, i will try this out tomorrow when i get home from classes. Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Yes, when you reboot, anything that you added via modprobe has to be added again. Put the modprobes in your go script. I thought that might be the case. I new to linux, I am trying to read and learn. #----cut here---- # Chip drivers modprobe it87 modprobe k8temp /usr/bin/sensors -s #----cut here---- I think it87 is exactly what the output said. I'll give that a go. Thanks for all the help. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 You can re-run sensors-detect anytime you want. Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 I did re run it then just entered the modprobe items above and it worked. When I ran "sensors" after that I got: VCore 1: +1.50 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) VCore 2: +1.49 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) +3.3V: +3.44 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) +5V: +5.13 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +6.85 V) +12V: +12.10 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +16.32 V) -12V: -20.49 V (min = -27.36 V, max = +3.93 V) -5V: -1.72 V (min = -13.64 V, max = +4.03 V) Stdby: +4.41 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +6.85 V) VBat: +3.26 V fan1: 2163 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 16) fan2: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 16) fan3: 5818 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = M/B Temp: +31.0 C (low = -1.0 C, high = +127.0 C) sensor = transistor CPU Temp: +25.0 C (low = -1.0 C, high = +127.0 C) sensor = thermal diode Temp3: +40.0 C (low = -1.0 C, high = +127.0 C) sensor = transistor cpu0_vid: +1.525 V This is very cool. Thank you. Now, Ill go and figure out how to get it all in a go script and such so that it all happens on startup, and figure out how to get my s2RAM working. When I run "s2ram" I just get command not found. Anyhow, finally my unRAID box can use less power and make less noise! Thanks for the help. Quote Link to comment
bubbaQ Posted January 12, 2009 Author Share Posted January 12, 2009 s2ram is not in BubbaRaid 0.0.11 ... it will be in the next release. Quote Link to comment
kricker Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 ahh okay. I was reading back thru the thread and thought it was put in long ago. No problem. I am testing my go script with the added modprobes now. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.